| Reviews |
| - 'The many virtues of Constitutional Justice
are evident throughout the piece. The author should be congratulated for even attempting to construct a normative theory of liberal constitutionalism ... Constitutional Justice
is a work that faithfully carries on the grand tradition of normative legal thought. No small task, and Allan succeeds admirably.
' - Law and Politics Book Review
|
| Description | | - Presents a systematic interpretation of constitutional law that draws explicitly on legal and political theory
- Comparative approach covering English, Australian, and American constitutional law
- The book presents a radical challenge to many of the traditional assumptions and interpretations of the British and Commonwealth constitutions.
| In Constitutional Justice
, the concept of the rule of law is explained and defended as an ideal of constitutionalism; and the general principles of public law are set in the broader perspective of legal and political philosophy. Although primarily an essay in constitutional theory, its practical implications are fully explained by reference to case-law examples. Drawing on the experience of
a number of common law countries--especially Britain, the United States, and Australia--Allan seeks to identify the common elements of a shared constitutional framework that provides the foundations, in each case, of a liberal democratic legal order. These common foundations include certain constraints on the exercise of state power, challenging the widespread view that the rule of law should be
conceived as a purely procedural ideal.
The book explains the essential connections between a range of matters critical to the relationship between citizen and state, including freedoms of speech and conscience, civil disobedience, procedural fairness, administrative justice, the right of silence, and equal protection or equality before the law. The limits of parliamentary sovereignty are shown
to derive from its status as a common law doctrine, when the common law is interpreted as a deliberative process of moral argument and justification. Legislative supremacy is qualified by a counter-balancing judicial sovereignty, ensuring the protection of fundamental common law rights of procedural fairness and equality.
|
Readership: Scholars and students of law, philosophy, and politics
| Contents |
1.
Introduction
2.
First Principles: The Rule of Law and Separation of Powers
3.
Legal Obligation and the Concept of Law
4.
Dissent and Disobedience
5.
Equal Justice and Due Process in Law
6.
Justiciability and Jurisdiction: Political Questions and the Scope of Judicial Review
7.
The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty
8.
Fundamental Common Law Rights and Equality
9.
Public Reason and Political Conflict
Bibliography
Table of Cases
Index of names
General Index
|
| Authors, editors,
and contributors |
T. R. S. Allan, Reader in Legal and Constitutional Theory, University of Cambridge
|
The specification in this catalogue, including without
limitation price, format, extent, number of illustrations,
and month of publication, was as accurate as
possible at the time the catalogue was compiled.
Occasionally, due to the nature of some contractual restrictions, we
are unable to ship a specific product to a particular territory.
Jacket images are provisional and liable to change before publication.
|
VIEW BASKET
