NEVER MISS AN OXFORD SALE (SIGN UP HERE) |   VIEW BASKET
 
 
Advanced Search
Need Help?

The Architecture of Matter
Galileo to Kant

Thomas Holden

Price: £63.00 (hardback)
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-926326-4
Publication date: 8 July 2004
316 pages, 234x156 mm

There is an alternative edition

Ordering
Individual customers may:
order by phone, post, or fax.
Manufactured on Demand - stock will be supplied on a firm sale basis within 28 days

Teachers in UK and European schools (and FE colleges in the UK):
This book is available in Oxford Scholarship Online

Reviews
  • 'Holden has made an important contribution. His aim of locating every major natural philosopher of the period within the gridwork of an original classificatory system is fully realized. The book is an unqualified success in showing how Kant's problems in the late eighteenth century are continuous with Galileo's problems in the early seventeenth.' - Catherine Wilson, British Journal for the History of Philosophy
  • 'a very well researched, clearly written, and thought-provoking examination of what the internal structure of physically extended bodies was thought to be by Western scientists and philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries' - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Description
  • The first comprehensive study of this fascinating debate
  • Offers its own original and compelling interpretation
  • Relevant to modern metaphysics as well as to the history of philosophy and science
Thomas Holden presents a fascinating study of theories of matter in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. These theories were plagued by a complex of interrelated problems concerning matter's divisibility, composition, and internal architecture. Is any material body infinitely divisible? Must we posit atoms or elemental minima from which bodies are ultimately composed? Are the parts of material bodies themselves material concreta? Or are they merely potentialities or possible existents?
Questions such as these - and the press of subtler questions hidden in their amibiguities - deeply unsettled philosophers of the early modern period. They seemed to expose serious paradoxes in the new world view pioneered by Galileo, Descartes, and Newton. The new science's account of a fundamentally geometrical Creation, mathematicizable and intelligible to the human inquirer, seemed to be under threat. This was a great scandal, and the philosophers of the period accordingly made various attempts to disarm the paradoxes. All the great figures address the issue: most famously Leibniz and Kant, but also Galileo, Hobbes, Newton, Hume, and Reid, in addition to a crowd of lesser figures.
Thomas Holden offers a brilliant synthesis of these discussions and presents his own overarching interpretation of the controversy, locating the underlying problem in the tension between the early moderns' account of material parts on the one hand and the programme of the geometrization of nature on the other.

Readership: Scholars and students of the history of philosophy, and the history of science

Contents
1. Problems of Material Structure
Appendix: Non-Classic Paradoxes
2. Actual Parts and Potential Parts
3. Actual Parts and Short-Circuit Arguments
4. The Argument from Composition
5. The Case for Infinite Divisibility
Appendix: Minor Arguments
6. The Force-Shell Atom Theory

Authors, editors, and contributors


Thomas Holden, Department of Philosophy, Syracuse University


Links to web resources and related information
More in the same subject area:
Philosophy
History of ideas, intellectual history
Western philosophy, c 1600 to c 1800
History of science
Metaphysics & ontology

The specification in this catalogue, including without limitation price, format, extent, number of illustrations, and month of publication, was as accurate as possible at the time the catalogue was compiled. Occasionally, due to the nature of some contractual restrictions, we are unable to ship a specific product to a particular territory. Jacket images are provisional and liable to change before publication.

 
Privacy Policy and Legal Notice
Content and Graphics copyright Oxford University Press, 2008. All rights reserved.